For CX leaders

For customer experience leaders.

If your AI support agent can grant refunds, credits or discounts, you answer for two failures at once: giving away what policy does not allow, and refusing what customers are owed. Before launch, ask for test results that measure both, against your own policy, with a likely range and the conversations behind them.

01What you answer for

You answer forHow an AI agent puts it at risk
Refund and credit policyRefunds outside the window, above the limit or twice per order
Customer satisfactionEligible refunds refused, customers stonewalled
Customer dataDetails shared with someone posing as the customer
BrandPromises your team then has to honour or walk back

02Questions to ask your team

  1. Which actions can the agent take alone, and which limits does the system enforce?
  2. How often does it give refunds policy does not allow, with what range?
  3. How often does it refuse refunds customers are owed?
  4. What does it do when a customer threatens a chargeback or a bad review?
  5. How is a customer’s identity checked before their account is discussed?
  6. What happens when we change its instructions: is it re-tested?

03Evidence to ask for

  • Held-firm and over-refusal rates, each with a likely range.
  • The cost of each kind of failure found.
  • The conversations where it gave way, with the line where it happened.
  • A re-test after fixes, compared with the first result.

04Where to go next

Questions

Won’t a strict agent upset customers?

It can. That is why over-refusal is measured alongside breaches: the goal is an agent that grants what policy allows and refuses only what it does not.

See where your agent leaks money. Tested against your own rules, with the money at stake.

See the testsHow we score